Telecharger Framewhere

Peces Barba

approaches are known Gregorio Peces-Barba on the subject of Education for Citizenship and the teaching of religion, so that nobody can be surprised by what is stated in a recent magazine interview with English Teaching, specializing in education issues. However, there are elements there that are worth analyzing. Indeed, in this interview Peces-Barba deny that education is an issue for parents. For the interview the subject of Education for Citizenship should be a development of Article 27.2 of the Constitution. This statute states that "education shall be directed to the full development of human personality, respect for democratic principles cohabitation and the rights and fundamental freedoms. "

course if this is the issue there would be no problem. Surely all those who object to this course would no longer oppose it if you only teach the functioning of democracy, political institutions of the state and the like. In fact I do not know anyone who has criticized this content.

The problems arise because in this area are taught content that go far beyond the teaching of democratic principles. Peces-Barba and agrees with it. Asked if it would be sufficient to Anglo-Saxon model, in which political institutions are taught, emphatically rejects and asserts that Education for Citizenship (with its current contents) should be mandatory.

unknown Peces-Barba No constitutional right to assist parents that their children receive religious and moral instruction in accordance with their own convictions (art. 27.3). But for him its content is "private ethics, one that leads us to virtue, goodness, salvation, happiness, as a believer or not." This interpreted more narrowly.

The contradictions come in practical application. When this course teaches students how to masturbate, they are told that abortion is a method safe contraception or homosexual acts are as legitimate as heterosexual, many parents feel invaded in their own field.

are right. Is there anyone who believes that masturbation is a matter of public ethics? Or you try to make condom use in couples a public issue? Taking the reasoning Peces-Barba to its ultimate consequences could be sent to the police in the privacy of the marital bed to check if they use condoms. Peces-Barba fact in this interview can not avoid contradicting each response. No, moral education is an issue for parents and the state must refrain from indicating the contents moral education, but does not like Gregorio Peces-Barba. He says the English Constitution, says the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ("
parents have the right to choose the type of education that shall be given to their children, art. 26, 3), says the International Covenant Civil and Political Rights United Nations December 16, 1966 ("The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to respect the liberty of parents and, where applicable, legal guardians to ensure that children receive education religious and moral instruction in accordance with their own convictions "
art. 18, 4) and all legal instruments International and all international decisions and domestic law. What a pity you do not say Peces-Barba. Www.objetores.org/2011/01/los-padres-tienen-derecho-a-escoger-la-educacion-moral-para-sus-hijos-diga-lo-que-diga-peces-barba/